Hortensia Amaro, Ph.D. - Keynote Lecturer - 9th Annual Summer Public Health Research Institute and Videoconference on Minority Health - June 9-13, 2003
9th Annual SPHRIMH
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Program for Ethnicity, Culture, and Health Outcomes (ECHO)
Congresswomen Madeleine Bordallo and Donna Christensen speaking from the U.S. House of Representatives
 10th Annual
SPHRIMH
   
 Your guide to minority health-related activities at UNC-CH
and elsewhere 

Participant Evaluation form

Site identification code (please insert the Site ID that appears in parentheses immediately after the name for the site you attended (view list of sites; the SiteID is usually the 9-digit postal code for the viewing location. If you viewed the webcast, just say "web")
Participant Code (4-digit number that you wrote on the attendance form)
If you would like your form to be entered into a drawing for a gift of appreciation, please enter your e-mail address (will be used ONLY for this purpose)?    
Note: The information below will be analyzed separately from the information above.
Which day's session are you evaluating?
Mon.  Tue.  Wed.  Thu.   		Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral		 Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
  1. The presentation increased my understanding of this subject and the relationship to the general field of public health.
  1. The topics covered today were important and relevant to the issue of minority health.
  1. The technology worked well (clear sound, clear picture, etc.)
  1. The facilitator at the site I attended helped things run smoothly.
  1. I was able to ask questions easily during today's sessions
 
First speaker:
 Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree		 Strongly
Disagree
  1. Overall, the speaker's presentation was appropriate for this session
  1. The speaker presented in a clear and organized manner.
  1. The speaker created a comfortable environment to elicit questions
  1. The materials for the presentation were effective.
  1. I learned material from this presentation that will help me in my research/work/study.
 
Second speaker: Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree		 Strongly
Disagree
  1. Overall, the speaker's presentation was appropriate for this session
  1. The speaker presented in a clear and organized manner.
  1. The speaker created a comfortable environment to elicit questions
  1. The materials for the presentation were effective.
  1. I learned material from this presentation that will help me in my research/work/study.
 16.  If this is the first day you are attending the Videoconference, please tell us how you learned about it:
  Minority Health Project web site (www.minority.unc.edu)
  Other web site, please specify
  Email from UNC-CH
  Told (or e-mailed) by a friend or associate
  Posted notice or poster
  Professional organization's newsletter/journal
  Flyer distributed at a conference
  Other, please specify
17. How many days of the Videoconference have you attended (counting today)?
                1            2            3            4          
 
18. If this is the last day you will be attending the Videoconference, please give us your overall evaluation:
  Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree		 Strongly
Disagree
  1. Overall, the Videoconference was very valuable
  1. I highly recommend the Videoconference.
21. Any comments about the speaker, topic, the web site, and anything else, including suggestions for future years?

Thank you very much for your interest in the
Summer Public Health Research Videoconference on Minority Health
and for taking the time to complete this evaluation form.

Back to the top
Minority Health Project| Department of Epidemiology
UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health
2104D McGavran-Greenberg, CB#7435 | Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435
Phone 919-966-7436 | Fax 919-966-2089| E-mail Minority_Health@unc.edu

06/18/05 Cal, 07/17/05 VicMinority_Health@unc.edu