Student comments from EPID160 Fall 2005
|
______________________________
|
“Vic is the best professor I have at this university. He really
cares about his students and is an inspirational instructor.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/29)
|
|
______________________________
|
“At this point I think it is hard to rate each individual because
only 2-3 people have facilitated a lab. So there may be stricter
criticism for the facilitators at this point.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/21)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think that we need to have more examples in our lecture's.
I think its really hard to learn the expected week's work of
quantitative material that were are given. I feel the material
is given to us and not taught. I know that we can not create
anymore lab times but maybe we could create a help session
for people that need specific help each week?”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/26)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Before I took Epid 160, I had heard dreadful things about the
labs from other international students. Frankly I was not particularly
looking forward to being in a lab session. To my surprise my
lab sessions have been really great from the suportive environment
created by the TA to the supportive and dynamic group experiences.
I think my best part of Epid 160 is the lab sessions”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/30)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I like the mood of the class- its fun! But sometimes it seems
that what we do in lecture just repeats what we read in the
book.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/26)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have been assigned to a great group!! Although we are still
getting to know one another, I feel comfortable speaking up
and sharing (even incorrect answers) during out group discussions.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/25)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am really enjoying this course! It is helping me to look
at my research through a more informed lens.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/10/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was tough. I learned that I do not know my group members
names as well as I thought I did! Maybe I need to match the
names with faces a bit more. It took me forever to separate
who was who in my mind!”
|
|
Dana,
MHA student,
HCAD,
TA: Nghia
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“My discussion group is enjoyable. I like the way that everyone
is respectful, and the way that our backgrounds effects the
way we answer some of the questions. My group is also well
balanced. Usually someone will have the right answer and is
able to communicate how he/she arrived to that answer.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“EPID160 is: A rocking good time and a real brain scratcher!”
|
|
Susanna,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Bob
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Bob has been very helpful to our group. He takes some of the
"scariness" out of this difficult class with his humor and
discussion contributions.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/22)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Everyone has been great thus far!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/30)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am enjoying our group discussions. We have a great mix of
disciplines in our group. Everyone is respectful and contributes
relevant comments.”
|
|
Denise,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: I-Jen
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“These forums help me feel connected to some classmates and
the TA. Otherwise I think I would feel isolated and less confident
that I am one the same page as others.”
|
|
Patricia,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Jesse
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far the course is moving at a relatively good pace and I
am taking in more information than I ever have in a related
course such as biostatistics or health planning and research
design. I am certain that I will complete this course with
a wealth of information that I will be able to use in the workplace.
Also, I find it very helpful to have an assigned TA to oversee
many of the assignments.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Had a little trouble with the scale for group members who have
not participated as much. The descriptions on the scale for
preparation and support do not really make sense if a member
just hasn't participated that much.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It's difficult for me to evaluate whether a student is well-prepared
(i.e. has done the reading, etc) in the web-based class.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/26)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Excellent work thus far: quick turnaround on responses.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have only been in this class about a month, and I find the
material challenging, esp. the case studies. Last week I attended
the Kansas Public Health Assoc. Conference and found myself
able to ask presenters specific questions relating to their
research, such as biases and incidence and prevalence material.
Being able to ask intelligent questions to PhD. candidates
validated my reasons for attending UNC. I feel I am getting
the best education, and really enjoy the expertise of my fellow
colleagues.”
|
|
Denise,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Marcel
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Lectures flow well and content is presented in an easy to understand
manner.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The convenience and opportunities that are provided by an internet
formatted course cannot be undervalued, but I do feel as if
I am missing an important part of the on-campus feel with the
case studies. I feel a lot of learning and sharing occurs in
the classroom style discussion of the assignments. I must admit
Dr. Schoenbach e-mails about attending the discussions makes
me feel the same way as when the central office in Topeka sends
out a blanket e- mail stating doughnuts and goodies are available
in the break room - (sorry field staff). But I truly am happy
to have the opportunity to take the course, and know there
is always an upside with the down and the discussion forum
is a wonderful benefit.”
|
|
Mary,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Martha
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Appreciate the peer evaluation requirement for this course.
It has made me take a better look at the forum discussions,
and see who is saying what and from what perspective. I am
learning a great deal. The format and resources for the course
are great.”
|
|
Clint,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Suzanne
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/27)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I really appreciate this course, what I'm learning, the supportive
interactions with Professor Schoenbach and our TA-Suzanne and
of course, my group. What a really nice way to learn Epidemiology.”
|
|
Jerry,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Suzanne
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“You will notice that I gave everyone who made an effort to
participate in the discussion forums a 5. I feel that a rating
any lower would not be a fair assessment. A one sentence comment
sometimes is just as effective as a two paragraph submission.
In addition, I am not exactly sure except for one forum who
the discussion leaders were. Some didn't identify themself
and I don't have a schedule of facilitators. For those people,
I put not yet.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am happy that our group has a great TA. Suzanne help us understand
the case materials and her comment to case study questions
enabled me to further understand the case materials.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/09/23)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Q 1 : How are things going so far in this course? Please include
any comments about
improvements or things that you like or don't like. (Your response
is anonymous.) [from module on Natural history / Population screening]
My initial response is that I miss the classroom environment,
but like everything new, it just takes a little getting used
to. it feels a little like I have to prove that I'm in the
class by participating as much as possible in the discussion
forum. this feels like an intense summer course that you have
to attend everyday. but I'm learning and enjoying the experience
so far.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/11/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It seems to be going well. I am still confused a bit about
grading and how you know how you are doing.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/14/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think that the course is going very well. some of the concepts
so far I am familiar with but my understanding has been solidified.
I am enjoying the course and it has already helped me in better
understanding the journal articles that I already have to read
for my research!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/14/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am having trouble with the calculations and anticipate great
difficulty on the exams. I would appreciate straight forward
explanations on the various ways to do the calculations so
that I can reference them to do a problem.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/15/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I like this course but I am not sure if there is a way for
someone to better explain formulas. sometimes the book does
not make it obviously clear. For example, learning to calculate
person-time years, months, etc. is tricky as well as cumulative
incidence. Thanks.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/15/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I do think that by the end of a module, I have thoroughly learned
the subject matter. I am spending more time than projected
when reading about the course, however, and it will get heavier
still. I must admit, I was unprepared for the amount of work
involved. I was surprised at how case study number three took
me through a very thorough analysis of the case. the questions
themselves provided guidance. when we do our final paper, I
am sure we will not have that. I hope that I will be ready.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/15/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Going well. I am learning a lot and am challenged, but not
overwhelmed, by the material both quantity and substance.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/15/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The hardest thing for me is finding the time to sit down and
read and comprehend and complete all of the items needed to
comprehend the material. This is my second class, but the first
one during an actual semester. I teach at a mid-size university
and have 4 classes a semester. So usually my time in the evenings
is devoted to grading papers and course prep. Now it is devoted
to Epid 160. So for me, it is a time management issue.
as for the course, the material is interesting, but I bet the
live class is more stimulating. this information leads itself
to discussion. Yes, we have the discussion forum, but we really
don't get to here the professors take on the subject matter.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/15/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“For better or worse, this class seems to require more time
and energy than other classes I have taken in the certificate
program. I am feeling a little overwhelmed by this.
It would be helpful to me if you could present some problems
and work through them in your slides. While I understand the
definitions of things and the formulas, picking out the information
properly from an article or presented case proves to be more
difficult for me.
Thanks”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/16/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I feel the lectures are great. I do struggle with the case
studies, but feel I gain understanding from them. I'm glad
that you do not grade these on correct answers, but participation.
I do like the discussion groups.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/16/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This is the second time I am taking this course. the last time
over I took the regular epid 160 at unc. I feel I am learning
much more this time (although the course itself seemed easier
the last time around esp the case studies)vic is a great teacher
(I wish he had taken Epi 160 the lst time I took it - may be
I would have understood epi better).”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/16/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great course. Very interesting. I only wish I could read more.
the greatest thing about this course is the diversity of backgrounds.
I have no criticisms whatsoever.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/16/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Well, I am really quite nervous still about my ability to complete
an on line course and degree program. I am always concerned
about whether I am utilizing my computer correctly and I think
that I am over and under analyzing at times. I am finding a
system that I think works for me and also find myself looking
forward to the discussion groups, which was something that
I did not think that I would like.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/16/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“What I like most so far is 1)the instructor and ta all reply
my e-mails promptly; 2)text book is a good selection; 3) reading
some articles published on peer-journal is always good to apply
what I have studied; 4) TA is flexible on deadline for case
study and group leader assignment under special circustances.
what I don't like or less like is that 1) courseback material
on "population perspective" is too long to complete reading
in one week in addition to reading chapter 4 and 5. 2) discussion
forum is good way for interaction among group members. Although
discussion should be encouraged, numbers of email sent from
each person should be approriately controlled. some messages
like "that is a good point" and "that point was well described
and well said" or simply one setence to agree with what the
prior person said, may not be necessary. Otherwise, the numbers
of e-mails are too overwhelming. 3) the communication e-mail
from instructor should be concise, clear, and short. 4) grading
is not timely enough. students are asked for a deadline for
case study. It's fair enough to ask TAs a deadline for grading
toward each case study question.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/17/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The material is relevant and applicable to current public health
issues. Despite being a challenge, this course is wonderful
and rewarding.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/17/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Things are going well so far. on occasion, I do have a hard
time keeping up with all the reading. my job is the type where
sometimes I do have to take work home with me and it can be
difficult at times to balance both. otherwise I am learning”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/17/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am really enjoying the course thus far. it makes me think
about concepts and ideas that I traditionally have not considered
since I was not in this field.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/17/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It has been an adjustment to be in school again after so many
years. I am having to relearn how to learn and devote time
to it. but I've enjoyed the course so far. the math/numbers
ideas have been difficult for me to grasp, so any examples
or further practice questions would be helpful. I do the questions
in the text book, but having futher explaination in the lecture
might be helpful. thanks”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/17/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think things are going very well in the course. I have been
impressed with the organization of the content, clarity of
expectations, and course layout. Epid 160 has been well thought-out,
and it shows.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/18/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far I feel that things are going pretty good. the biggest
concern that I have is that I work fulltime and hope that there
is some flexibility for the exams and final paper deadlines.
I am going to start on the final paper at the earliest possible
opportunity. thanks.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/18/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far I think the course is going quite well. the website
is extremely well laid-out and the weekly work and assignments
are always easy to understand and find.
The only thing I have found confusing so far is when the discussion
forums begin and end. I'm not sure if commments I am sending
on Sunday are included in the final summary sent to the ta.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/18/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This course is much harder for me than previous courses I have
taken in the certificate program. the hardest thing for me
is figuring out all of the terminology, which varies slightly
from the lecture to the readings to the case studies, and so
I am spending probably the majority of my time in this class
on definitions and trying to grasp the differences between
different terms.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/18/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Things are going well. it has taken a week to get used to the
internet course since there is no introductory packet. A suggestion
would be maybe to include one with the coursepacket for the
internet course”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/18/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Instructor and t.a. are readily accessible. the lectures and
textbook are quite interesting and fairly easy to comprehend,
but the case study coursepak is extremely rigorous and the
case study questions are not clear and concise which makes
the work challenging. I am spending 24-30 hours a week in epid”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think the course is really well designed and thought out.
my particular group is very interactive and inciteful, great
and varied background so th ediscussion board is always busy.
my trouble is completely time management, work, school, family...
so what else is new. no complaints about the course, content,
faculty or fellow students.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I appreciate that the schedule is consistent (e.g., readings
due by monday, case study due by wed, ect.). this enables me
to 'keep organized' in terms of what's due when in the class.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“To tell you the truth, I'm really struggling to keep up with
the reading, the case studies, tutorials and the discussion
threads. I'm fairly well organized about timelines, but I'm
having trouble (spending hours) answering the case study questions.
I think I understand the concepts when I read the text and
listen to the tutorials, but when I try to answer the questions,
I begin to question my intelligence! I think I am spending
about 20 hours a week on this course and becoming a bit difficult
to be around. I know that I have learned lots, but the condensed
time frame has been difficult. it has been ages since I attended
university and the blackboard program is new to me, as well.
I keep hoping it will get easier?
thanks!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think the actual tutorials and readings are very easy to
understand, but some of the calculations that we are expected
to do are confusing seeing as we are not necessarily given
the procedure on how to go about doing this. maybe this is
because I am a "book" person, but just a thought.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Overall, the course is okay. epidemiology is a really interesting
topic and I feel it could be made more exciting. I think that
the case studies and discussion forums are too much busy work.
you should make the case study questions the discussion forum.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I'm struggling with the course. I've had a difficult time adjusting
to internet classes. I read all of the assigned reading and
find my self going back to try and comprehend the information.
I have referred to two additional epidemiology books which
seem to offer better explanations for me. the course is very
interesting but very time consuming. I feel like I am just
completing an assignment when another begins - I can't seem
to get ahead. my ta has been very responsive in terms of responding
to me with whatever questions, e-mails I have and that has
made a difference.
I am committed to completing the course but will re-evaluate
at the completion of the semester if this is the right fit
for me.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Things has been going well (since I found out that we would
all get 10's for the second case study). I'm starting to get
use to where everything is on the website and time limits.
my ta is helpful in giving advice about where I missed points
on case studies.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have nothing to compare this course with so...
I can only tell how I feel with this course - old and slow!
with the different committments I have, I need to be online
late and my work keeps me from making entries early in the
day. I fear this will negatively affect my final grade. I try
to respond to the questions without looking at what others
write - so I can determine if I am on the same page. I have
been, but then I wonder if the group thinks "boring" or if
I am really contributing anything beneficial to the group process.
I really don't think I know enough to not know enough at this
point! thanks.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I still am getting the hang of juggling work/business travel/
and classwork, but enjoy the opportunity.
the texts are good, but I would have more confidence that I
really could apply the material w/ more problems to solve (on
my own, not for credit!) my ta stated he would look for more
intro level problems to share w/ me (hopefully I will get those
soon.... I really need to *get* the material the week it is
assigned with this load). I enjoy the discussion forum's comfortable
feeling, but it is not as substantive as I'd like. I don't
feel very stimulated by most reponses. it is difficult to accomplish
the case study by wednesday each week, given my work schedule.
because I travel, I spend most weekends doing paperwork, and
it is hard to fit in the reading/prep then. I wish there were
more applications to the lessons we were learning, so we could
see how to integrate everything...maybe that will come over
time. I am very pleased with opportunity to take coursework
like this--it is the only way I could pull it off (if, in fact,
I can).”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Not well. this course is taking more time than I expected (more
than any other course I've taken in the certificate program)
and I am having difficulty keeping up.
Having said that, I do like the lectures and readings.
I have found the TA's comments about our small group discussions
to be deflating and discouraging when we do not stick strictly
to the question at hand.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/19/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have had a few questions for my ta that has taken her about
a week to get back to me on. I would appreciate it if she could
get back to me sooner.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This course is intense. I would be helpful to have a better
idea about what is important and what is not. I am not sure
how this can be accomplished, but sometimes the relationships
that are explained in the model case study responses, don't
match with the question.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far so good. just trying to catch up with the readings and
implementation with the case study.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I'm learning a lot but I think some of the case study questions
assume an understanding and knowledge base in epi that I just
don't have. this is especially true of some of the inferences”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This is a very difficult course compared to the others that
I have taken so far. much more time consuming than biostatistics.
however, it is very interesting. I think it's the amount of
resources and websites and blackboard sites and help that actually
make it so overwhelming. I'm always afraid that I'm missing
or forgetting something.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am really getting alot out of the course. I like the reinforcement
that comes from getting the information from several sources:
the text, notes, lectures, case study questions, etc. and then
the forum is giving me a good picture of the real world, by
reading others comments.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far I am really enjoying the readings and the discussions.
the readings give me a lot to sink my teeth into. however,
I am big time hating the math parts. I haven't had biostatistics
yet - but that isn't much of an excuse for me. percentages
and such are not my strong suit. if possible, I would like
to have the option of practice questions that we can then get
the answers for in the case of the math problems. for this
week's assignments, all of the practice questions dealt with
the more written rather than the mathematical issues.
thanks very much!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/20/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I like the pace of the course and I am finding it interesting.
the ta and instructor have been both accessible and helpful.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/21/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think the course is good. some of the case study questions
have been somewhat difficult and seem to cover material at
a much greater level of depth than what is in the text or lecture.
as a distance learning course I thought the course would be
more flexible in regards to time committment throughout the
week - its sometimes difficult to try to monitor the discussion
group daily for 5 days.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/21/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I like the course so far. I would change the case study to
be due the friday instead of the middle of the week. I have
trouble sometimes following the lectures because of the length.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/22/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Having a cheat sheet on the various ways you can calculate
the different statistics would be most helpful.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am 200% satisfied with this course. the course material,
lecture (both the content and the way it is delivered), discussion
forum all make me understand epidemiology and deepen my interest
in epidemiology. I should have taken this course earlier!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am having some difficulty answering the case study questions.
I have completed all the readings and would like to know what
you suggest? I feel I am getting further behing and wonder
if it would be best to drop the course????”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Going well. I appreciate the emphasis on explaining concepts
in laymen's terms.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/24/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am enjoying this course sos far. it is a little more detailed
than I anticipated but I will get in the swing of things soon.
I appreciate the help my ta i-jen has given me over the past
few weeks.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/25/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Having a cheat sheet on the various ways you can calculate
the different statistics would be most helpful.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am 200% satisfied with this course. the course material,
lecture (both the content and the way it is delivered), discussion
forum all make me understand epidemiology and deepen my interest
in epidemiology. I should have taken this course earlier!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am having some difficulty answering the case study questions.
I have completed all the readings and would like to know what
you suggest? I feel I am getting further behing and wonder
if it would be best to drop the course????”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/23/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Going well. I appreciate the emphasis on explaining concepts
in laymen's terms.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/24/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Things are going well, I think. it's taken our discussion group
a few weeks to really get off the ground, but I think we're
doing just fine now. in retrospect, I really should have brushed
up on my math skills before taking this course. I enjoy listening
to the lectures. I think everything works well together. at
this point, the only problem I have had is that all the emails
from the certificate program office told me that the course
wouldn't be available on blackboard until the 30th. when I
logged on (on the 30th), I discovered that everything had been
available for a week and I was now basically a week behind.
I think I've finally caught up, but it was a real struggle
to do so. other than that, everything is good.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/26/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Love the course, very interesting topics and the materials
are great. it's nice to be able to learn the material through
reading the chapters, viewing the slides and listening to the
lecture. I appreciate the flexibility the instructor and ta's
(karminder) have shown.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/26/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Sorry, I forgot to fill this out as I put all my comments regarding
the course at the end of the ta evaluation. hope that is okay.
just have some concerns about workload and expectations, ability
to complete assignments and being able to absorb the concepts.
the class is well presented, although sometimes the case study
questions are not very clear to me. the class must be a large
amount of work for all the instructors and tas, as the workload
seems like a lot on my end, and there are so many students
in the class. looking forward to a successful semester. thanks.”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/27/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I love the course. it is well organized and everything works
well on blackboard. in previous internet courses that I took,
a lot of time was spent in contacting the teachers to clarify
this or that. blackboard was only used for copies of reading
material. basically, all I had was a self-study course and
test proctors.
The online discussion groups are great. i.m learning a lot
from my classmates and they don.t make me feel too dumb.
online lectures are very convenient. I stop, start, and replay
as needed. the powerpoint slides are an easy way to go back
and look something up.
My time management is the thing that is plaguing me the most.
I have to learn not to put everything off until the last minute
in case I need help. (wednesday at midnight is a bad time to
realize that). linda, my ta, even worked with me there by giving
me an extension when I needed more time to figure out some
notes of encouragement always seem to come at the right time.
just when I need it, a suggestion, joke, or an answer to a
question that I have not asked comes from dr. schoenbach. he
must have done this before!!!”
|
|
(HowAreThings1,
Internet course,
09/27/2005)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The course was okay. I thought it was extremely unfair that
the Tuesday group had to complete a case study when the Wednesday
group did not. Either Teusday should have ben cancelled or
the Wednesday group should have had to turn in answers to the
case study. The lecture for group was the same as Vic's lecture.
We do not need the same info twice in 1 hour. Very difficult
to complete some case studies as they are due immediately after
the material is presented.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Vic--you seem like a sweetheart and I thought it was so dear
when you teared up on the first lecture while discussing how
you met your wife and again on the last lecture when you were
saying your goodbye. Best wishes, you're a kind, patient teacher
with a great sense of humor. Happy Holidays! Jaime--thanks
for your patience with the group. You were kind and helpful
and I'm glad I got your group! Congratulations on finishing
up your studies--best wishes, I'm sure you'll do well in whatever
you choose to do post graduation! Happy Holidays!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I really enjoyed the lab discussions; however I don't think
it was fair that the Tuesday sections had to attend lab on
two more occasions than the Wednesday sections. Perhaps there
is a better way to handle this...”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I really enjoyed working in our group. I think we had great
discussions and I learned from it.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Our group normed quickly and performed well together. They
were all helpful in facilitating the learning experience.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It is more difficult for faciliators during the last few weeks
and during weeks when there are exams out. If there is any
way to avoid having students faciltate on these days it would
seem to be easier to evaluate their job as a facilitator.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I enjoyed this class and found the topics very useful and related
to my reasearch. One thing I didn't agree with is the disclaimer
that "There may not be one right answer". Often times for
most questions there is one right answer and I think this disclaimer
helps gloss over things if one is unclear and lead to a less
rigorous discussion.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I don't feel I can really assess my group mates properly especially
as I was not fully there but generally I felt I had a great
group that tried to be very inclusive in the work and supportive
of its members. Group members worked hard to ensure everyone
was on the same page. I'm sure my group contributed a lot to
whatever understanding i had of the course because of the patient
explanations and willingness to carry everone along. I had
dreaded EPI 160 especially the group lab because my colleagues
who did the course last year had negative feedback about the
lab, but my experience was surprisingly different. I felt the
lab was my best part of the course from the TA session to the
group work. I know that any kind of achievement I make in the
course is because I had a great TA and a good lab group.”
|
|
Edem,
MPH student,
MHCH,
TA: Mary Beth
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/13)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Dr. Schoenbach is a wonderful professor. His lectures are intellectually
stimulating, and I thoroughly enjoyed his class.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Please allow for a higher word count on the exam.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I was part of a great lab group. Everyone came to class prepared
and willing to discuss the case studies. I really enjoyed being
able to learn from students in other fields. I hope to cross
paths again with these future professionals.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great class. I really really enjoyed it and I feel like I learned
a lot in this class.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The answers to the case study questions tended to be long and
detailed while exam answers were restricted by word limits.
Though the use of word limits is perfectly understandable,
given the size of the class, trying to give the same level
of detail in exam answers was difficult to do with the word
limits. Giving some examples in the case study answers as to
what would be an acceptable short answer to the question before
giving all the details maybe useful for some students.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have enjoyed the structure and content of EPID 160. The final
lab discussion was most enjoyable to me because it coerced
us to talk about things that do not have a clear answer. I
wish that we would have had more case study questions and discussions
like that. I am disappointed that some of my group members
did not participate more. Some started to participate more
towards the end of the semester, after receiving unsatisfactory
evaluations and upon realization that participation was a big
part of the course grade. Or, they would participate more if
they noticed that Vic had entered the room. I am also disappointed
with my exam grades. I know that I have a good understanding
of almost all EPID concepts that we learned as well as the
articles used for the exam. I am worried that a low grade will
not reflect my understanding of the material.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Discussion is a great part of this class. I would have enjoyed
more of a focus on this part of the section and less on the
mini-lecture, maybe with more involvement of the TA and the
professor for part of the discussion. I enjoyed lectures, but
discussion was really the high point.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2005/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Despite what I think is a well studied and refined introductory
course, I find the material was difficult to learn as fully
as I would have in a classroom where some questions would have
helped me clarify the material better than only having a TA
for that purpose. I believe this is due to the difficulty of
conceptualizing some of the designs and application of epidemiology.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Course reflected some of the 'fault-lines' which exist between
epi and biostatistics -- on the one hand, perhaps too much
emphasis on study designs while at the same time too little
recognition of the value of statistical analysis -- perhaps
more attention to 'adjustment' or 'normalization' of populations;
population characteristics and categories (e.g., racial/ethnic
designations; behavioral characteristics of populations; housing;
unconventional demographic characteristics -- grandparent -
granchild households, split households, legal vs social relationships;
social networks). Instructors were extraordinarily invested in
this course -- and in student performance -- Vic and Bob both
outstanding.”
|
|
Paul,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Bob
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Bob did a wonderful job as our TA. His communication with me
and the group was always motivating and he responded quickly
and thoroughly to any problems or questions I had throughout
the semester. I was a bit nervous about taking my first course
in Public Health online, but given the encouragement from Bob
and the great experience, I would do it again in a heart beat.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Very time consuming class. So much work for 3 credits, especially
compared to the other courses in the Core Concepts cirriculum.
Really felt I was drowning for most of the semester. My TA,
Bob, was a terrific source of support.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a difficult class because of the shear volume of information
and activities involved. I enjoyed it though it wasn't at all
what I expected. Each on-line course I take seems to have its
own challenges but I always gain vast knowledge about the subject
and learn something about myself at the same time.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This has been a wonderful course and has certainly provided
a foundation in epidemiology upon which I can build!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/13)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The word limits on the exams are extremely frustrating. I sympathize
with your grading load, but it is very difficult to properly
address 3-5 questions (you may label them as sub-questions,
but they are often separate issues entirely) in 60-100 words.
Yes, succinctness is valuable in writing, but not at the expense
of thorough, complete coverage of an issue. I have two suggestions:
1) Reduce the number of subquestions by about one per question.
OR 2) Increase the number of words allowed per question and
use more graders. Furthermore, it seemed that the model answers
for the exams sometimes exceeded the word limit given to the
students. I didn't check this specifically, but it sure seemed
that way.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I was impressed with the care taken by Vic and I-Jen, responses
were quick and thoughtful. Thanks so much for a great semester!”
|
|
Teresa,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: I-Jen
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a quite fine class in which I was able to start applying
the concepts I learned almost day one on the job.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It would be helpful on the title of the discussion group to
include the module number.”
|
|
Patricia,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Jesse
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This course was very challenging, but I feel that the information
will be of great benefit in the future.”
|
|
Erin,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Jesse
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I have learned so much from this class that I can use in my
career. Unlike other online classes that I have taken, this
one keeps you informed, and I felt like part of the class group
thanks to Jesse, my TA, and Vic's lectures and the group discussions.
Thanks for a great experience!!!”
|
|
Paulette,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Jesse
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I felt that every member of the group was a pleasure to work
with. The discussions were always lively and challanging.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Really enjoyed the course and learnt a great deal! Would have
liked more interaction with the rest of the class and with
the Prof. For example there were international fellows in the
class, but there was no way to hear their views on topics or
to interact with them.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I just wanted to comment about the support I recieved from
my TA. I would not have made it through the class without his
support and continued encouragement. I do hope that I made
it through since I have not recieved a grade, but none the
less, he really tried to make me feel competent and teachable.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great class, interesting information, great dissemination.
Thanks so much for the flexibility and the support for the
class.”
|
|
Jason,
MPH student,
PUBX,
TA: Karminder
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I was extremely impressed by the organization of the online
course of EPID 160. The lectures, case studies, exams and paper
were invaluable teaching methods. As a first online course
for me, it took me a while to get used to the discussion forums
and I am afraid I did not take as much advantage of them as
I could have. That was entirely my fault as the questions and
issues for discussion were excellent. Thank-you to all the
instructors, especially the group 9 instructor Linda, and to
Vic. I would recommend this course to anyone!!”
|
|
Vifvan,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Linda
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The discussion forum for this class needs to be changed. Because
the criteria for evaluation of the forums is so detailed, students
give way too much information, and often post too much just
so that they can get "all of the credit." I thought the point
of the forum was to mimic a classroom. If that were so, one
would raise his/her hand and give 1 or 2 facts then their opinion.
In the forum, we applauded those who rattled off a ton of statistics.
Perhaps I have missed the point, but I would have gotten more
out of the forums if the discussion was more structured and
if people were encouraged to share their thoughts, instead
of bombarding you with their knowledge.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a great course and very well run for an online class.
I felt everything was fairly graded, the TA always promptly
replied to emails and Vic did a great job of making himself
available as well!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thank you for this wonderful class. This class has sparked
my interest in epidemiology!”
|
|
Michelle,
PHD student,
HMSC,
TA: Linda
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a tough class but the support from TAs and the instructor
was excellent. I can't say I would recommend taking this class
again on the internet but I am leaps ahead of where I was in
the beginning.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Just wanted to let you know that I'm glad you use PRB reference
materials - my mother works there and was actually an editor
of the bulletin we used in one of the first lectures. She was
thrilled when i told her that you highlighted their work in
the lecture. Because they provide many of their publications
for a reduced or no cost, it is very important for them to
get feedback on which publications are most useful. Please
continue to let them know what a good job they do! thanks!”
|
|
Julia,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Marcel
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/10)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a difficult course requiring many hours of work, but
I must say that I gained valuable and useful knowledge which
I will use in my work. The best part was definitely the discussion
forums and the outbreak investigation (wish we could have done
more of those).”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great course! Well facilitated!”
|
|
Marianne,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Marcel
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thank you for being patient with this "challenged" student!
I always felt that you both were supportive of my attempts
in this learning process.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Martha was a tremendous help and encouragement through this
course. She is the reason I stayed in the class after a difficult
first half of the semester.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The course was challenging and certainly opened my eyes to
what I didn't know about epidemiology. It went beyond understanding
the concepts to truly being able to think critically about
the different aspects of epidemiology and public health.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am so glad that I didn't drop the course. I must thank Vic,
Kristal and Suzanne for the encouragement and help they offered,
while I was making this decision. I learned so much. Thanks
for the experience.”
|
|
Clint,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Suzanne
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thanks Dr. Schoenbach and Suzanne; You folks sure made epidemiology
fun and interesting as well as a great learning tool. I appreciate
your flexibility early on at the beginning of the course. I
hope you are satisfied with my progess in the course.”
|
|
Jerry,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Suzanne
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I know the idea of having case studies due on Wednesdays and
then the discussion running from Thursday to Monday was probably
to intended to spread homework out over the week, but, frankly,
I found it very confusing: I would submit the case study early
in the week and then completely forget about the discussion
group...having everything start on Mondays - even if the due
dates remain different to help the TAs spread out their workload
- would be more logical and easier to remember. Also, while
I suppose the discussion group assignments might help a bit
in learning public health concepts, I really felt that compared
to the case studies they were pretty useless in helping students
come to grips with the concepts and tools of epidemiology.”
|
|
Bridget,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Suzanne
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thank you for giving me the opportunity to take this class.
I searched high and low for a way to study public health while
I was living in Egypt and couldn't find any good options, but
when I learned of the chance to take the online diploma through
UNC I knew I had to try it. Epidemiology has exceeded my expectations
and I am so glad to have been a part of it. Ciao, arrevederci,
aurevoir, kwa heri, maasalama, anyungheekaseyo! (Bye-bye)”
|
|
Emily,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Suzanne
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2005/12/06)
|
(An additional 26 comments were received but the students did not
authorize their dissemination.)
2005cd,
compiled 10/05/2005 |