EPID600 Internet class
Rating scales for Peer and TA Evaluations
|
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 1. |
Participating in group discussion forums |
Attendance rating |
| |
Missed 3 or more discussion forums* or dominated discussion forums
in a way that made it difficult for all to participate |
1 - Not adequate |
| |
Missed 2 discussion forums* or dominated occasional
forums to the extent that others found it difficult to participate |
2 - Adequate |
| |
Participated in all but 1 discussion forum* and did not dominate
the discussion |
3 - Fully satisfactory |
| |
Made at least two, well-spaced out contributions
in each forum. |
4 - Excellent |
| |
Made three well-spaced out contributions
(i.e., near the beginning, middle, and end of forum)
in each forum.
|
5 - Outstanding |
| |
* missing a forum is excused with a compelling reason and timely
notice to small group members and TA |
|
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 2. |
Preparing for group discussion forums (reading
textbook; reading/listening to lecture; reading case study article
and supplementary materials; answering the Case Study questions) |
Preparation rating |
| |
Contributions to discussion forums suggest that student has not
read or listened to assigned textbook readings, case studies,
or lectures or is significantly behind schedule. |
1 - Not adequate |
| |
Contributions to discussion forums suggest that student has usually
read or listened to textbook, case-studies, and lectures. |
2 - Adequate |
| |
Contributions to discussion forums suggest that student has regularly
studied textbook, case studies, and lectures in a timely manner. |
3 - Fully satisfactory |
| |
Contributions to discussion forums suggest careful and timely
study of required textbook reading, lecture, and case-study. |
4 - Excellent |
| |
Contributions to discussion forums suggest careful and timely study
of course materials and also outside reading. |
5 - Outstanding |
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 3. |
Making good quality contributions in discussion forums |
Contribution rating |
| |
Barely contributes to group discussions, knowledge, awareness,
and understanding. |
1 - Not adequate |
| |
Makes occasional contributions or largely superficial
ones |
2 - Adequate |
| |
Regularly makes relevant contributions to discussion forums |
3 - Fully satisfactory |
| |
Regularly makes relevant contributions that reflect careful
reading of others' comments and add to the group's knowledge,
understanding, insight, or awareness |
4 - Excellent |
| |
Regularly makes multiple thoughtful or insightful contributions
that reflect 1) careful reading of others' comments and also 2)
knowledge beyond the required course material |
5 - Outstanding |
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 4. |
Serving as Discussion Forum Leader, including preparation
(Note this will not apply for students who have not yet been a Forum
Leader- see NA option for this criterion) |
Facilitating rating |
| |
One or more of: apparently had not studied the materials
for this module, did not start the forum with an acceptable
introduction, failed to remind the group of the question at
hand if the discussion wandered, did not write a summary or
summary was poorly written and/or poorly covered the discussion |
1 - Not adequate |
| |
Started the forum with an acceptable introduction, reminded
the group of the question at hand if the discussion wandered,
but summary was not well written or omitted several key items
from the discussion |
2 - Adequate |
| |
Started the forum with an acceptable introduction, reminded the
group of the question at hand if the discussion wandered, summary
was well written and included most of the key items from the discussion
|
3 - Fully satisfactory |
| |
Started the forum with a well thought-out introduction,
reminded the group of the question at hand if the discussion wandered,
interjected helpful comments at appropriate times, summary
was well written and included almost all of the key items from the
discussion; or served as an adequate (rating of 2) Leader for more
than one forum |
4 - Excellent |
| |
Started the forum with a well thought out introduction reflecting
outside reading or knowledge, reminded the group of the question at
hand if the discussion wandered, interjected helpful comments at appropriate
times and reflecting outside reading or knowledge, summary
was well organized and well written and included essentially
all of the key items from the discussion); or served as a fully satisfactory
(rating of 3) Leader for more than one forum |
5 - Outstanding |
| |
OR: This criterion does not apply for this student yet |
NA |
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 5. |
Supporting the other members of the group by listening to and
valuing the opinions of others |
Supporting rating |
| |
Adversely affects group learning due to hostile or negative remarks,
lack of respect for contributions from others |
1 - Not adequate |
| |
Generally acknowledges other group members' comments, tolerates
but does not appreciate ideas and contributions that differ
from her/his own perspective |
2 – Adequate |
| |
Regularly acknowledges other group members comments, respects and
appreciates the ideas and contributions of others |
3 - Fully satisfactory |
| |
Contributions are regularly respectful of and responsive
to previous comments by other group members, reflecting an open
mind, patience, and encouragement to others to express their ideas;
helps other students understand difficult concepts |
4 - Excellent |
| |
Excellent (see level 4) and also brings out the value of others' contributions
that may not have been readily apparent. |
5 - Outstanding |
| |
|
Close
This Window |
| 6. |
Overall evaluation of how much this person has contributed to the group and to your learning (this rating influences the course grade) |
Overall rating |
| |
Has not contributed at all to the group or even assisted individual group members. |
0% - No contribution |
| |
Has made some but minimal contributions to group discussions or assisting individual group members. |
25% - Minimal contributions |
| |
Has made occasional good contributions or frequent, but superficial, ones. |
50% - Inadequate contributions |
| |
Has contributed her/his share or nearly so, in all or almost all respects. |
75% - Adequate contributions |
| |
Has made good quality contributions regularly, often helping the group to reach the correct answer, is a good facilitator, explains concepts well. |
90% - Very good contributions |
| |
Regularly makes excellent contributions to discussions, is a very good facilitator, explains concepts well, provides patient assistance to individual group members. |
100% - Excellent contributions |
| |
Contributes fully and often beyond what would be expected; is an excellent facilitator. |
110% - Above and beyond |
| |
Is a leader in helping the group and individual members to understand the course material fully and reach true consensus answers. |
120% - Outstanding contributor |
| |
|
|
| |
|
8/31/2003vs, 9/8/2007vs |
|