Overview
There are two basic rules for collaborating in EPID600:
- Examinations: You may use published (print or web) materials when working on examinations, but you may not communicate about the examination, even indirectly, with anyone other than an instructor
- Case studies: You may use published (print or web) materials when working on case studies and you may work with anyone on your individual and group consensus case study submissions, so long as: (a) you each work on every question rather than “divide and copy” and (b) none of the persons involved has access to the instructor answers.
Why does EPID600 devote so much attention to the Honor Code and rules for collaborating on course work?
Cheating, plagiarism, and other forms of academic dishonesty are widespread in schools and universities. For example, a recent article (“Fuqua students may face expulsion”, Durham Herald-Sun, 4/28/2007, A1,A4) reported on 37 Duke business students accused of cheating on a take-home exam. The article also mentioned a Center for Academic Integrity 2002-2004 survey of American MBA students in which 56% reported having cheated.
EPID600 uses take-home, open-book assessments and encourages collaboration and group work on case studies. But some students have gone beyond permissible collaboration and suffered serious consequences. When anyone breaks these rules, the entire class suffers. The belief that others are not obeying the rules erodes confidence in the ability to trust and introduces anxieties that those who do follow the rules will be disadvantaged. Faculty are required to report suspected violations of the Honor Code. Having to investigate possible cheating incidents takes instructor time away from helping students learn the material.
What is allowed, and what is not allowed?
Here are some examples of behaviors that have occurred in relation to case studies and examinations, presented in question-and-answer format.
- Question: Do I need to cite material that I use from the lecture slides, textbook, or the Evolving Text? I sincerely hope I did not cause any honor code violations. Please kindly let me know if there was a problem with my exam in terms of references. Answer: Direct quotes should be cited. “General knowledge” in the lectures or texts does not need to be cited, but if you are referring to something that is not likely to be in many sources, then citing is desirable.
- Question: Can I look up and use information on the web in order to answer examination questions? Answer: Yes.
- Question: Can I share a copy of the article on which the exam is based with my roommate, in order to save paper? Answer: That is not recommended, and if there are notes, highlighting, or other markings on the article it could (and has) amount to communication.
- Question: Can I show my outline for my final paper to another EPID600 student - or to a friend - just to make sure that I am on the right track. Answer: No - the instructions say that you may not communicate with anyone about the final paper article or your paper.
- Question: I do all of the case studies with my friend and study together. I answered all of the examination questions by myself, but I did call her to ask about a few of the answers, because I didn’t want to pay for a hint. Does that violate the Honor Code? Answer: Yes. You may not communicate with anyone other than an instructor about the examinations.
- Question: A classmate and I got help with the case study from a friend who took the course last year. We ran out of time, so to help us finish the case study he gave us the instructor answers that he received when he took the course. Was that all right? Answer: No. It was fine to obtain help from your friend, but you may not have access to the instructor answers before they have been posted in Blackboard.
Do you have a question? Please ask Dr. S.
More information about this semester’s course
Back to the EPID600 home page
4/30/2007, 5/16/2009vs by Vic
|